No Exit
So I thought it'd be fun to a Lit Analysis on this story, since I enjoyed it quite a bit. :)
General
1. This play started with three people being brought to a single room by a valet. They are surprised that there are no torture devices, it was just the three of them stuck in a room together. They come to be irritated more and more by each other, and soon can't stand each other. They bicker and argue and fight even after they reveal why they were condemned, and even then they couldn't be agreeable. Garcin finally realizes that "hell is other people."
2. The theme of this novel was probably best summarized by the sentence "Hell is other people." True hell can sometimes be summarized as something as simple as that. It was pure torture for Garcin, Inez, and Estelle to be in the same room as each other; that alone was making them suffer
3. Play's are told mainly through the dialogue of the characters. The three characters in the play were sometimes angry, sometimes panicky, and sometimes very solemn.
4. Sarte uses indirect characterization, allegory, imagery, symbolism, and many others. Allegory is particulary important, since the room really wasn't just a room, but a symbol for hell, and how incredibly simple torture and hell can truly be for people.
Characterization
1. Indirect Characterization - "INEZ: Suppose I try to be your glass? Come and pay me a visit, dear. Here's a place for you on my sofa." pg. 18; "ESTELLE: Pneumonia. It's over now, they're leaving the cemetery. Good-by. Good-by.Quite a crowd they are. My husband's stayed at home. Prostrated with grief, poor man.How about you?" pg. 9 The author uses indirect characterization in the dialogue, it not only shows who the characters are, but also what the other two characters think of him/her.
2. The author's diction and syntax don't change majorly with each character. Garcin, Inez, and Estelle sound just a bit different when speaking. Although, I would have to say Inez stands out a bit more than the other two. Garcin and Estelle are more in common, looking with fondness on their old loved ones and sharing a common crime. Inez on the other hand looks at them with a bit of disdain, saying they should just forget about their old lives. I would say she is just a bit more cold and accepting of hell than they are.
3. All three of them are static characters, but also round characters. Throughout the play, they remain the same condemned souls stuck in the same room together. Nothing about them changes, only their feelings of hatred toward each other growing stronger and stronger. But they are also characters that reveal personal and deep things about themselves. We learn about how each of them were condemned to enter hell, and we see their feelings clearly.
4. At the end, I felt like I had just read a story, and didn't really meet the characters, Honestly, I'm kind of glad I don't meet people like Garcin, Inez, and Estelle. Well, I'm sure I have, but I don't think I have spent a lot of time with them. To me, reading this story was kind of like looking at this room from above, observing each reaction from each character while eating some popcorn. It was kind of like I was God, or maybe even the Devil, and just delighting in these people suffering so much. :) Hehe.
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Thinking Outside the Box
Both Plato's and Sartre's stories held an import message behind all the symbolism used in the stories themselves. In the allegory, the prisoners represented ignorance in a pure state, for they did not know what is real, and only believed the few things they knew to be what the world was. Sartre's play's message was summarized very well in a quote from Garcin "Hell is other people." At first glance, neither literary work seems to have much in common with the other. But after thinking about it for a bit, I realized that both had to do with the mind. Our mind is the ultimate thing that will make us suffer or help us progress. The prisoner's minds were closed to the thought of a world outside the cave, even when one of their own told them. The three prisoners in No Exit were also suffering by their own mind, allowing themselves to feel tortured by each other, and the emptiness that the room had to offer. Plato's solution was a bit more easier to decipher: you either have to open your mind to rid yourself of ignorance, or let others drag you out of it. As for Sartre... his solution was a bit harder to find. I think the only thing you can do when dealing with a personal hell is to embrace it. Not in a warm way, but just acceptance of what is happening is the first step in dealing with a situation such as that. And at the end of the play, the three characters did come to realize that they would be stuck together.
Saturday, November 24, 2012
"Allegory of the Cave" Sonnet!
Now I'm not gonna lie. Poetry is not my strong point. Thank goodness I had my sister Lydia to help me out. She is the stronger one when it comes to art and poetry. Here you go!
The shackles holding them back
From the life outside their reality
The flames and shadows surrounded by black
Seems to be their only mentality
Selected to be unchained
Was a man no weaker than the rest
Let outside the cave and a life he’d gained
Better than he had ever guessed
Returned he had with many stories to tell
To his friends chained up and all
But for they did not believe the man
Of the life outside the wall.
Now friends, tell me whom you’d rather be?
The ones who sit in blissful ignorance, or the man who was
set free?
Thanks again to Lydia!! :) People should bug at her school and say she's the best sister for helping out!
Monday, November 12, 2012
Lit Analysis #3
The House on Mango Street
General
1. I had seen this book analyzed by someone else in the class (Alex Ramirez!) and was happily surprised. I'd had this book for a few years and never really gotten a chance to read it. I'm so glad now that I have. The House on Mango Street focuses on a young girl named Esperanza, who lives with three siblings and her parents on a house that she is unhappy with. The story is told in short chapters, and it shows how Esperanza changes and matures emotionally and physically. She makes friends, loses family, and deals with obstacles along the way, from her discontent with her name to being kissed by an older man at her job. With the many experiences that she has to go through, this story was very touching and I enjoyed reading it.
2. I think the main theme is discovery of one's self. Throughout the story Esperanza is struggling to determine who she truly is. She doesn't like what her name means and wishes to change it so she can say who she is, and there also other events in her life that make her question herself, such as her choice of a friend like Sally. Not until the end does she truly know who she is: a writer.
3. The story is told in Esperana's point of view. She sounds young and innocent, but at the same time the way she describes things are very artistic. For example, in one of the first chapters called "Hairs" she describes her mother's hair:
"...like little rosettes, like little candy circles all curly and pretty because she pinned it in pincurls all day, sweet to put your nose into when she is holding you, holding you and you feel safe, is the warm smell of bread before you bake it,.." pg. 6
Sometimes when she talks it seems like she says things in such a factual, nonchalant way, even though what she's saying could be considered quite sad or terrible
"Most likely I will go to hell and most likely I deserve to be there. My mother was born on an evil day and prays for me." pg. 58
"I am an ugly daughter. I am the one nobody comes for." pg. 88
4. The first technique I noticed was that the author did not introduce herself at the beginning of the story, which made me curious and interested as to who was telling me these things. I guess the way Esperanza speaks, her diction, is another technique that influences the story. Her voice is pure, and also gives a good look inside of Esperanza's mind, how she longs for a friend, a change in her name, and how she wants to leave this neighborhood. Pretty much the way Esperanza tells her story is the biggest literary technique to be noticed.
Characterization
1. We get most of the indirect characterization of Esperanza by the way she talks about things. She reveals how she feels about her house on Mango Street: "I knew then I had to have a house. A real house. One I could point to. But this isn't it. The house on Mango Street isn't it." (pg. 5). Also, she talks about she wants to be when she grows up, beautiful and cruel: "I am one who leaves the table like a man, without putting back the chair or picking up the plate." (pg. 89) I didn't really notice a lot of direct characterization, nothing that the author Sanda Cisneros puts out there that is obvious for the reader to see. We can only figure out the characters through Esperanza's eyes and mouth.
2. Esperanza's syntax and diction do not stray much from its original type. Despite some traumatic experiences that she dealt with at such a young age, she seemed to retain her pureness of voice. She had been assaulted, and felt ashamed of how she lived, but towards the end the only thing that truly changed was her view of herself, and how she feels about her home on Mango Street.
3. The protagonist is dynamic and round. She went from being unhappy with who she was and where she came from to being more accepting towards it. It took her quite a few events to finally come to those realizations.
4. I feel like a met a person and connected with her. Esperanza reminded me of myself at a much younger, more scary time in my life, when reality hits you hard and fast. A lot of the time I wished I could've been that person she could confide in, that friend she desperately wanted. Sandra Cisneros created a wonderful voice for this young girl, and I can see why many people love this story.
General
1. I had seen this book analyzed by someone else in the class (Alex Ramirez!) and was happily surprised. I'd had this book for a few years and never really gotten a chance to read it. I'm so glad now that I have. The House on Mango Street focuses on a young girl named Esperanza, who lives with three siblings and her parents on a house that she is unhappy with. The story is told in short chapters, and it shows how Esperanza changes and matures emotionally and physically. She makes friends, loses family, and deals with obstacles along the way, from her discontent with her name to being kissed by an older man at her job. With the many experiences that she has to go through, this story was very touching and I enjoyed reading it.
2. I think the main theme is discovery of one's self. Throughout the story Esperanza is struggling to determine who she truly is. She doesn't like what her name means and wishes to change it so she can say who she is, and there also other events in her life that make her question herself, such as her choice of a friend like Sally. Not until the end does she truly know who she is: a writer.
3. The story is told in Esperana's point of view. She sounds young and innocent, but at the same time the way she describes things are very artistic. For example, in one of the first chapters called "Hairs" she describes her mother's hair:
"...like little rosettes, like little candy circles all curly and pretty because she pinned it in pincurls all day, sweet to put your nose into when she is holding you, holding you and you feel safe, is the warm smell of bread before you bake it,.." pg. 6
Sometimes when she talks it seems like she says things in such a factual, nonchalant way, even though what she's saying could be considered quite sad or terrible
"Most likely I will go to hell and most likely I deserve to be there. My mother was born on an evil day and prays for me." pg. 58
"I am an ugly daughter. I am the one nobody comes for." pg. 88
4. The first technique I noticed was that the author did not introduce herself at the beginning of the story, which made me curious and interested as to who was telling me these things. I guess the way Esperanza speaks, her diction, is another technique that influences the story. Her voice is pure, and also gives a good look inside of Esperanza's mind, how she longs for a friend, a change in her name, and how she wants to leave this neighborhood. Pretty much the way Esperanza tells her story is the biggest literary technique to be noticed.
Characterization
1. We get most of the indirect characterization of Esperanza by the way she talks about things. She reveals how she feels about her house on Mango Street: "I knew then I had to have a house. A real house. One I could point to. But this isn't it. The house on Mango Street isn't it." (pg. 5). Also, she talks about she wants to be when she grows up, beautiful and cruel: "I am one who leaves the table like a man, without putting back the chair or picking up the plate." (pg. 89) I didn't really notice a lot of direct characterization, nothing that the author Sanda Cisneros puts out there that is obvious for the reader to see. We can only figure out the characters through Esperanza's eyes and mouth.
2. Esperanza's syntax and diction do not stray much from its original type. Despite some traumatic experiences that she dealt with at such a young age, she seemed to retain her pureness of voice. She had been assaulted, and felt ashamed of how she lived, but towards the end the only thing that truly changed was her view of herself, and how she feels about her home on Mango Street.
3. The protagonist is dynamic and round. She went from being unhappy with who she was and where she came from to being more accepting towards it. It took her quite a few events to finally come to those realizations.
4. I feel like a met a person and connected with her. Esperanza reminded me of myself at a much younger, more scary time in my life, when reality hits you hard and fast. A lot of the time I wished I could've been that person she could confide in, that friend she desperately wanted. Sandra Cisneros created a wonderful voice for this young girl, and I can see why many people love this story.
Friday, November 9, 2012
Big Question
Are all lies considered to be wrong, or or some white lies acceptable in some situations?
Monday, October 29, 2012
Lit Analysis #2
Frankenstein
GENERAL
1. Well, this story is basically a story within a story. A sailor named Walton meets a stranger in the North Pole named Victor Frankenstein. Victor goes on to tell the story of his life. He has to marry his adopted sister in the future. He goes away to study, and learns how to create a body with corpse body parts and bring it to life. He then spins a tale of how his creation gets out of control, killing his younger brother because he was angry with the way the world treated him. His creation wanted a mate, so Victor makes him one, but decides to destroy after he's done, thinking that the two monsters will try to destroy things together. The first monster, having seen this, seeks revenge on Victor, and ended up killing his wife (sister) on their wedding night, which caused the death of his father. Victor then seeks revenge on the monster, and then chases him all over, until he meets Walton. THEN he dies. The monster came and saw this, realized he had nothing to live for, and then walked away to die. :(
2. I believe secrecy and revenge are too main themes in this story. A lot of the accidents and deaths that happened were caused by the withholding of the truth. Victor kept the truth of his younger brother's death which ended in the execution of an innocent servant. He also did not let anyone know about his monster, which caused the monster to hide from society. Victor and the monster are also seeking revenge on each other quite a lot, each doing terrible things to the things or people they cared for.
3. There was quite a lot of emotional stuff going on in this story. A lot of death and a lot of sadness coming from quite a few characters gave it a somber tone. Frankenstein's monster said emotional things like “I shall die, and what I now feel be no longer felt….” and “Cursed, cursed creator!...my feeling of those of rage and revenge.”
4. Shelley uses techniques such as imagery (talking about things look e.g the moon), foreshadowing (Walton saying he needed a friend. Whoa here comes a man on a sled!), and the constant change of points of view (Walton's, Victor's and the monster's) to make the story interesting to the reader.
CHARACTERIZATION
1. Two examples of direct characterization is when Victor is describing his creation. He is saying that he is a ruthless monster. Another example is when the author tells that he is consumes by the idea and creation of life and that is all the Victor can think of. Two examples of indirect characterization happen twice the the monster he has created. Once it happened when he asked victor if he could make him a companion and here the readers realize that he indeed has feelings. Then second time is after Victor dies the monster decides to go and kill himself because he creator has died. In this instant the readers also see that he is not just a ruthless monster but a caring one. The author uses both of these approaches I think so that the reader can see if the monster really is one of if he is like many other people.
2. The author uses diction because you can see the language change when he has Victor speak and the monster speak. For example you can tell the Victor is way more proper when he speaks and the monster is not. I think he uses this to show that Victor is more educated and the monster is not.
3. If views came that Victor was the protagonist I do believe that he is a dynamic character because his whole life after his creation was made was consumed of fear and wanting revenge. If the protagonist was considered the monster I would say he is also dynamic because throughout the story he was very confused. Then Victor decided to kill his partner I think brought the monster to be overwhelmed by grief and wanting revenge. I believe Victor is a round character because his character changes after his creation and after the death of his wife. I would consider the Monster a flat character because he stays the same pretty much throughout the story. He is created knowing only a few things and does not really know anything else except for what he feels and what he thinks is ugly or wrong.
4. I felt that I came away actually knowing a person. The monster was the one I feel I came away knowing because you were able to see his true feelings and the end of the story when his creator died.
GENERAL
1. Well, this story is basically a story within a story. A sailor named Walton meets a stranger in the North Pole named Victor Frankenstein. Victor goes on to tell the story of his life. He has to marry his adopted sister in the future. He goes away to study, and learns how to create a body with corpse body parts and bring it to life. He then spins a tale of how his creation gets out of control, killing his younger brother because he was angry with the way the world treated him. His creation wanted a mate, so Victor makes him one, but decides to destroy after he's done, thinking that the two monsters will try to destroy things together. The first monster, having seen this, seeks revenge on Victor, and ended up killing his wife (sister) on their wedding night, which caused the death of his father. Victor then seeks revenge on the monster, and then chases him all over, until he meets Walton. THEN he dies. The monster came and saw this, realized he had nothing to live for, and then walked away to die. :(
2. I believe secrecy and revenge are too main themes in this story. A lot of the accidents and deaths that happened were caused by the withholding of the truth. Victor kept the truth of his younger brother's death which ended in the execution of an innocent servant. He also did not let anyone know about his monster, which caused the monster to hide from society. Victor and the monster are also seeking revenge on each other quite a lot, each doing terrible things to the things or people they cared for.
3. There was quite a lot of emotional stuff going on in this story. A lot of death and a lot of sadness coming from quite a few characters gave it a somber tone. Frankenstein's monster said emotional things like “I shall die, and what I now feel be no longer felt….” and “Cursed, cursed creator!...my feeling of those of rage and revenge.”
4. Shelley uses techniques such as imagery (talking about things look e.g the moon), foreshadowing (Walton saying he needed a friend. Whoa here comes a man on a sled!), and the constant change of points of view (Walton's, Victor's and the monster's) to make the story interesting to the reader.
CHARACTERIZATION
1. Two examples of direct characterization is when Victor is describing his creation. He is saying that he is a ruthless monster. Another example is when the author tells that he is consumes by the idea and creation of life and that is all the Victor can think of. Two examples of indirect characterization happen twice the the monster he has created. Once it happened when he asked victor if he could make him a companion and here the readers realize that he indeed has feelings. Then second time is after Victor dies the monster decides to go and kill himself because he creator has died. In this instant the readers also see that he is not just a ruthless monster but a caring one. The author uses both of these approaches I think so that the reader can see if the monster really is one of if he is like many other people.
2. The author uses diction because you can see the language change when he has Victor speak and the monster speak. For example you can tell the Victor is way more proper when he speaks and the monster is not. I think he uses this to show that Victor is more educated and the monster is not.
3. If views came that Victor was the protagonist I do believe that he is a dynamic character because his whole life after his creation was made was consumed of fear and wanting revenge. If the protagonist was considered the monster I would say he is also dynamic because throughout the story he was very confused. Then Victor decided to kill his partner I think brought the monster to be overwhelmed by grief and wanting revenge. I believe Victor is a round character because his character changes after his creation and after the death of his wife. I would consider the Monster a flat character because he stays the same pretty much throughout the story. He is created knowing only a few things and does not really know anything else except for what he feels and what he thinks is ugly or wrong.
4. I felt that I came away actually knowing a person. The monster was the one I feel I came away knowing because you were able to see his true feelings and the end of the story when his creator died.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)